Workplaces warned against cookie cutter design

By Michael Koziol
Updated October 25 2014 - 8:08am, first published 7:37am
Australian workplace restructures were too often about "glorified hot-desking" rather than genuinely responding to staff needs, a workplace expert says. Photo: Daniel O'Brien
Australian workplace restructures were too often about "glorified hot-desking" rather than genuinely responding to staff needs, a workplace expert says. Photo: Daniel O'Brien
Australian workplace restructures were too often about "glorified hot-desking" rather than genuinely responding to staff needs, a workplace expert says. Photo: Daniel O'Brien
Australian workplace restructures were too often about "glorified hot-desking" rather than genuinely responding to staff needs, a workplace expert says. Photo: Daniel O'Brien
Australian workplace restructures were too often about "glorified hot-desking" rather than genuinely responding to staff needs, a workplace expert says. Photo: Daniel O'Brien
Australian workplace restructures were too often about "glorified hot-desking" rather than genuinely responding to staff needs, a workplace expert says. Photo: Daniel O'Brien
Australian workplace restructures were too often about "glorified hot-desking" rather than genuinely responding to staff needs, a workplace expert says. Photo: Daniel O'Brien
Australian workplace restructures were too often about "glorified hot-desking" rather than genuinely responding to staff needs, a workplace expert says. Photo: Daniel O'Brien

Philip Ross is worried about Australian workplaces.

Subscribe now for unlimited access.

$0/

(min cost $0)

or signup to continue reading

See subscription options